Unexpected weather?

April 12th, 2011

[To Scorpiosail Home Page]

Two weeks ago Phuket and several other regions of Thailand were hit by severe storms, causing several fatalities and great loss of property. On shore landslides killed dozens of locals and tourists and on the coast boats broke their moorings and were washed up on the beaches or smashed against rocks.

When we arrived in Phuket on the second of April, after our two-week passage from the Maldives, we were told it was the first non rainy day in more than a week. There had been periods of 50 knots of wind and there had been almost 200 mm of rain in at least one 24-hour period. Good timing on our side for once, it appears.

The reason I’m writing this post is that I find it difficult to understand why these storms are allowed to cause so much grief and destruction. After all, they don’t just fall out of the sky unexpectedly. Actually, when I was preparing for our trip in the Maldives more than a week before the storm and 1,500 nautical miles (almost 3,000 km) away, I saw that this low pressure system was about to hit Thailand – that is if you believe what the GRIB files are predicting 7-8 days ahead.

On March 18, two days before our departure from Male, I downloaded GRIBs showing cyclonic-pattern winds at Phuket on the 168 hour (7 days) forecast. The forecasts on the two following days confirmed that there was something unusual going on. The image below shows what the GRIB file of March 20 forecasted for the Phuket area on March 27.

This forecast didn’t concern us aboard Scorpio at all, we would still be far away south of the Bay of Bengal. However, we naturally kept a close look at the progress of this predicted weather system all the way.

But how could so many in Thailand be taken by surprise?

Why Somali Piracy has to stop

April 7th, 2011

[To Scorpiosail Home Page]

The successful hi-jackers are quickly turning into some kind of Robin Hood figures, who are giving lessons how to take from the rich and give to the poor.
Read more ..

The Countdown Has Started

March 18th, 2011

[To Scorpiosail Homepage]

The last face of our preparations for a longer passage is looking for weather and deciding on the exact date of departure. We have been doing that for a couple of days now.

Read more ..

Warm beer causes death

March 6th, 2011

[To Scorpiosail Home Page]

Our fridge and freezer breaks down the evening before we are getting guests from back home!

Not only are we forced to serve non-alcoholic beer (all alcohol is banned in the Maldives), which we can live with, but now we have to serve it warm, which may be difficult to live with.

Room temperature here is minimum 30C, so it will be a challenge to keep any food on board also. And as I have explained elsewhere on this web site, the resorts in the Maldives are not welcoming cruisers. Catering will be a challenge indeed.

Take a look at this link: Wife shoots husband dead for giving her warm beer.

Dumb as a Brick? – to the Med at All Costs.

March 1st, 2011

[To Scorpiosail Home Page]

Maybe you think I’ve written enough about piracy already. Yes, but I haven’t said enough.

Read more ..

Cruiser’s Paradise Lost? – The Maldives

February 26th, 2011

[To Scorpiosail Home Page]

1,200 tropical islands – 1,000 of them uninhabited, crystal clear water, abundant marine life, great weather and very friendly people.

A cruiser’s paradise, you may think? Not entirely so, unfortunately –the government of the Maldives does not encourage private cruising in their archipelago.

Read more ..

Hired Guns and the Shipping of Yachts

February 13th, 2011

[To Scorpiosail Home Page]

If you are serious about sailing across the Arabian Sea, you should hire a group of armed security guards.

I received this message by e-mail from the commander of one of the Coalition warships. Could it be more plainly expressed; ordinary sailing yachts cannot expect any assistance from the Coalition Forces, who are patrolling the area by 30 warships from a dozen of nations of NATO, EU and others.

Landlubbers, imagine calling the police on 911 for protection from robbers on your door step and they advise you to employ your own armed security guards instead. We are not irresponsibly cruising here in this area because of a whim; many of us are on our way home on a long journey, which in our case has lasted for more than a decade.

Read more ..

Send in Jack Bauer

February 6th, 2011

[To Scorpiosail Home Page]

If you wonder who Jack Bauer is, don’t read any further, this story is wasted on you.

All we need is Chloe directing satellites on all motherships used by the pirate groups. Then Jack can either be dropped paragliding from high altitude or popped from a submarine. He takes out the ships one by one and in 24 hours this ridiculous situation will be over and the Indian Ocean a safer place.

Wishful thinking?

[

Dilemma in the Arabian Sea

February 2nd, 2011

[To Scorpiosail Home Page]

All of a sudden, we are finding ourselves in a tricky situation. I feel a bit like the guy who was painting the floor and found himself in a corner without escape routes.

This map shows reported attacks by pirates in the Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea during January 2011.

Read the full story here ..

The Pirates are Winning!

January 14th, 2011

[To Scorpiosail Home Page]

Well, we didn’t catch the 11.1.11.11 -train. But it appears that we will finally start tomorrow on our final 5,000nm voyage getting back to the Mediterranean, which we last left 11 years ago. The trip will take us from Thailand to the Maldives (1,600nm), then across the Arabian Sea to Oman (1,000-1500nm depending on route), through the Gulf of Aden (GoA), the strait of Bab-el-mandeb into the Red Sea and further to the Suez Canal and Port Said (1,000+nm). The last leg from Egypt to Turkey is only 500nm I guess.

As you know, the real challenge on this route is piracy. Until recently the most dangerous area has been GoA, between Salalah in Oman and Aden in Yemen. We have been focusing on this challenge and mentally prepared us for this roughly 700nm long stretch. Unfortunately, the rules have changed! Since November 2010 the pirates have successfully used at least 5 captured ships as mother-ships enabling them to operate several thousands of miles from Somalia. Some of these hijacked ships have completed multiple patrols since they were captured.

Only about a year ago (November 2009) the eastern boundary of the High Risk Area was considered (www.riskintelligence.eu) to be around 62E. See map below.

Just a few days ago (January 10, 2011) Nato Shipping Centre issued an alert map showing recent positions of pirate attacks as north as 21N and east as 64E. See map below. Eye witnesses describe attacks in small fast skiffs with larger (mother ships) in the vicinity.


Click on map for larger copy

According to the Danger of Piracy guide lines published by The International Sailing Federation ISAF, in co-operation with the MSCHOA (Maritime Security Centre – Horn of Africa) set up by EU NAVFOR (EU naval force) Operation ATALANTA, the risk area stretches all the way to 10S and 78E (which is the southern tip of India)!

I find it impossible to understand why the coalition forces, formed by dozens of battle ships from many countries, cannot stop these mother-ships. They are giant freighters, for crying out loud, impossible to hide and easy to identify. Why don’t the navies just drop a bomb on each of them? Anybody in command of a highjacked ship must be presumed to be guilty of piracy. As a matter of fact, I think the pirates have made a mistake by implementing this new strategy. This should give the counter-piracy forces new opportunities, which, sadly, they do not seem to be taking advantage of.

Ok, if the pirates are using hostages as shields, maybe we cannot shoot the ships to pieces, but it should be a piece of a cake, with modern technology, to either put a shadow on each ship or put a tracker on them by satellite. Knowing the exact position of these bastards should make it easy for the coalition forces to be in the vicinity and prevent attacks.

I borrowed the title of this blog post from a great review by Jeffrey Gettleman in The New York Review of Books.